FBK

    Predictive Analytics

    Transforming raw data into strategic intelligence to elevate your tendering success with AI.

    Leverage historical data and AI to accurately predict trends and optimize pricing strategies

    Price Prediction — Q3 2025
    Medical Devices
    Lab Equipment
    Consumables
    IT Services

    4 categories · 127 historical tenders

    Accuracy

    94.2%

    Trend

    ↑ +12.3%

    Model active
    Next refresh in 3d

    Analyze win & loss patterns to uncover winning strategies from your historical tender

    Bid Performance — Last 12 months
    Won
    127
    Lost
    43
    Pending
    18

    Top win factors

    Competitive pricing
    Fast delivery terms

    Top loss reasons

    Price above market average
    Missing certifications
    68% win rate
    32% loss rate

    Identify recurring trends and root causes in lost tenders to improve future success rates

    Pricing misalignment

    38% of losses — avg. 12% above benchmark

    Compliance gaps

    27% of losses — missing certifications

    Late submissions

    19% of losses — avg. 2.3 days late

    Missing documentation

    16% of losses — incomplete technical specs

    4 patterns identified
    3 regions affected

    Evaluate how awarding criteria impact your success rate by region or product line

    76%

    Criteria Alignment

    Across 4 regions

    Price weight

    72%

    EMEA

    Quality

    85%

    APAC

    Delivery

    61%

    Americas

    Compliance

    93%

    Global

    Focus: Compliance scores

    Intelligent forecasting

    Leverage historical data and advanced AI models to accurately predict trends and outcomes. Make data-driven pricing decisions with confidence.

    Optimize pricing strategies in just few clicks
    Price Forecasting·Product catalog
    #ProductCurrent avg.PredictedTrendConfidence
    1HemoCheck Rapid€4.80€5.12↑ +6.7%High
    2UltraView X2€2,340€2,280↓ -2.6%High
    3BioReagent Plus€12.40€12.90↑ +4.0%High
    4InfuPump Elite€156.00€162.50↑ +4.2%Medium
    5ServiPack Annual€890.00€875.00↓ -1.7%Medium
    6CardioMonitor Pro€1,450€1,520↑ +4.8%High
    7VitalScan 300€38.90€37.80↓ -2.8%High
    8GlucoStar Strip€0.95€0.88↓ -7.4%Medium
    9ChemPanel XR€8.90€9.30↑ +4.5%High
    Forecast details
    Data points84 tenders
    Competitor avg.€2,450
    Historical avg.€2,410
    Volatility±4.1%
    Trend periodLast 24 months

    Win & Loss Analysis

    Analyze historical data to uncover winning strategies and highlight factors contributing to unsuccessful bids. Understand what drives success across your portfolio.

    Turn award data into winning strategies
    OverviewBy regionBy product
    Last 12 months
    All divisions
    Win rate
    68%
    ↑ +5% vs prior
    Total bids
    127
    86 won · 41 lost
    Avg. bid value
    €2.3M
    ↑ +12% vs prior
    Top win factors
    Competitive pricing34%
    Full compliance28%
    Fast delivery terms22%
    Strong product match11%
    Best technical score5%
    Top loss factors
    Price above benchmark43%
    Missing certifications31%
    Late submission26%

    Pattern Identification

    Identify recurring trends and root causes in lost tenders, from pricing misalignments to compliance issues. Take targeted action to improve.

    Address root causes to improve success rates
    Patterns identifiedLast 12 months
    Pricing misalignment
    38% of lost tenders · avg. 12% above benchmark
    Missing certifications
    27% of lost tenders · ISO 14971 most common gap
    Late submissions
    19% of lost tenders · avg. 2.3 days late
    Incomplete technical specs
    16% of lost tenders · missing annex data
    Delivery terms too slow
    14% of lost tenders · 48h required, 72h offered
    Product-lot mismatch
    11% of lost tenders · wrong SKU mapping
    Warranty below requirement
    9% of lost tenders · 12mo offered vs 24mo required
    Language barrier
    7% of lost tenders · docs not in local language
    Pricing misalignment
    38% of lost tenders · avg. 12% above benchmark
    Missing certifications
    27% of lost tenders · ISO 14971 most common gap
    Late submissions
    19% of lost tenders · avg. 2.3 days late
    Incomplete technical specs
    16% of lost tenders · missing annex data
    Delivery terms too slow
    14% of lost tenders · 48h required, 72h offered
    Product-lot mismatch
    11% of lost tenders · wrong SKU mapping
    Warranty below requirement
    9% of lost tenders · 12mo offered vs 24mo required
    Language barrier
    7% of lost tenders · docs not in local language
    + 12 more patterns identified

    Award Criteria Analysis

    Evaluate how specific awarding criteria impact your success rate by region or product line, and tailor your strategies accordingly.

    Focus on criteria that drive success
    How does MEAT 70/30 perform vs lowest price across our top regions?
    RegionMEAT 70/30MEAT 60/40Lowest price
    Italy78%65%42%
    Germany72%68%51%
    France61%70%55%
    UK74%58%39%
    Key insight: MEAT 70/30 consistently outperforms lowest price by 25-35pp across all regions. In France, MEAT 60/40 is the strongest format — consider adjusting your strategy for French tenders.
    Ask a follow-up...

    What you can achieve

    80%

    Faster forecasting

    2x

    Increase in precision

    10-25%

    Higher win rate

    Don't be left behind

    The best feedback come from the people of your business.

    "Our decision-making speed increased threefold with Predictive Intelligence, giving us a critical edge in competitive tendering processes."

    Commercial Excellence Director

    Leading Healthcare Company

    Security at every layer

    FBK keeps your data safe with world-class security and data privacy measures.

    SOC 1 & SOC 2 Type II

    Independently audited controls ensure your data is handled with the highest standards of security and compliance.

    Encrypted in transit and at rest

    All data is protected using industry-standard encryption protocols, both during transfer and while stored.

    We don't train on your data

    Your sensitive datasets, internal models and decision logic remain private and under your full control.

    What if you could identify winning patterns in seconds?